Fighting For Freedom
5/30/2009
Well here we are again having to deal with sadist down at the Louisville Metro Animal services, who say they love animals however show the exact opposite when I went to have my dog get her yearly tags.
While having to stand in line for a hour, I watched a worker speak on the phone, instead of doing their job, along with being surrounded by mindless sheep handing over their money as if in a walking coma, my eyes were wandering around looking at 3 open desks where workers should be sitting along with paying attention to the animals locked in cages outside under a roof made of metal in a long line, reminding myself of the pictures of Guantanimo I've seen from which those prisoners are to get a trial, unlike the dogs I was looking at, who can be taken to gallows at any time.
Any ways, it FINALLY came time to speak to the 300lb woman sitting on her ars from which reminded myself of a Nazi German woman with red hair and missing only the big fat mole on her big fat upper lip and ruger on her hip, I handed her my paper work knowing there would be something come up, I mean I am dealing with a Government entity, and, as I figured I was not let down.
It seems that these incompetent waste of tax dollars had allowed my dog last year, who is going on 9 years old and is unaltered, had been found by a Vet to have heart problems, from which the Vet said she more than likely would not make it through surgery to be spayed, to be tagged at the cost of, a altered dog price $9.50 last year. I simply told this, talking heart attack, that my dog had been, one hour before her surgery to be spayed, found to have a heart problem from which I turned in the Vet's diagnosis and opinion to LMAS and was asked to only pay the amount of an altered dog.
The woman of course argued that I had to pay the unaltered price of $50.00 and as you can imagine, myself and Helga went round and round from which she called her LT. from which told her that I would have to pay the unaltered price or, get this, write and ask PERMISSION to not pay the unaltered price. So I simply told this Nazi sadist to give me back my paperwork and the Government will not get anything.
The Louisville Metro Animal Services say they love pets but as you can see, they want to kill my dog, because that's what will happen if she goes under for surgery, or pay $50.00 for a dog that is a house dog and does not run rampant in the neighborhood, on top of being old and having a heart problem. Sounds about right for this Nazi entity, don't ya think?
Not too forget, Helga, during her hard breathing and perfuse sweating, began speaking of doing a yard search from which I'm sure alot of you remember last year when the Louisville Metro Animal Services tried that same thing with myself, from which I told them that unless they have a warrant, they will not set foot on my property. I got ahold of Scott Harrington who talked to Doug Hawkins from which a call was made to these unconstitutional sadist and the matter was dropped, quickly.
However these unconstitutional tyrants have forgotten about that and are intending on breaking my 4th Amendment right once again.
All I have to say is that this Government entity, (Louisville Metro Animal Services) who say they love animals, however, want to kill my dog and throw the constitution in the trash, will have one hell of a fight on their hands and will ultimately cost them money they are making now, by strong arming the sheep in this community to bow down and hand over their money without question. I believe that is called robbery. As you all know, I don't bow down to anyone and will fight this tyrannical entity all the way to the Supreme court if need be.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Oath Keepers, "Not On Our Watch"
Fighting for Freedom
5/26/2009
With such illustrations as the other day when a video was shown on the news of 5 police officers beating an unarmed, unconsence man with billybats and fist, which ultimately lead to all 5 cops being fired, does not define the majority of men and women serving in all services including the police.
90% of police that take the oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic truly mean it, unlike the ones that beat the man in Alabama. Matter of fact there is a non-partisan association called Oath Keepers, currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, peace officers, and veterans that has a website telling exactly what orders they will not obey because they are unconstitutional and therefore unlawful.
Here are the orders these freedom loving Military and police will not obey with their reasoning.
1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people.
The attempt to disarm the people on April 19, 1775 was the spark of open conflict in the American Revolution. That vile attempt was an act of war, and the American people fought back in justified, righteous self-defense of their natural rights. Any such order today would also be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason. We will not make war on our own people, and we will not commit treason by obeying any such treasonous order.
Nor will we assist, or support any such attempt to disarm the people by other government entities, either state or federal.
In addition, we affirm that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military power of the people so that they will, in the last resort, have effective final recourse to arms and to the God of Hosts in the face of tyranny. Accordingly, we oppose any and all further infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In particular we oppose a renewal of the misnamed “assault-weapons” ban or the enactment of H.R. 45 (which would register and track gun owners like convicted pedophiles).
2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects - such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the use of “writs of assistance,” which were essentially warrantless searches because there was no requirement of a showing of probable cause to a judge, and the first fiery embers of American resistance were born in opposition to those infamous writs. The Founders considered all warrantless searches to be unreasonable and egregious. It was to prevent a repeat of such violations of the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects that the Fourth Amendment was written.
We expect that sweeping warrantless searches of homes and vehicles, under some pretext, will be the means used to attempt to disarm the people.
3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the denial of the right to jury trial, the use of admiralty courts (military tribunals) instead, and the application of the laws of war to the colonists. After that experience, and being well aware of the infamous Star Chamber in English history, the Founders ensured that the international laws of war would apply only to foreign enemies, not to the American people. Thus, the Article III Treason Clause establishes the only constitutional form of trial for an American, not serving in the military, who is accused of making war on his own nation. Such a trial for treason must be before a civilian jury, not a tribunal.
The international laws of war do not trump our Bill of Rights. We reject as illegitimate any such claimed power, as did the Supreme Court in Ex Parte Milligan (1865). Any attempt to apply the laws of war to American civilians, under any pretext, such as against domestic “militia” groups the government brands “domestic terrorists,” is an act of war and an act of treason.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the attempt “to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power” by disbanding the Massachusetts legislature and appointing General Gage as “military governor.” The attempt to disarm the people of Massachusetts during that martial law sparked our Revolution. Accordingly, the power to impose martial law – the absolute rule over the people by a military officer with his will alone being law – is nowhere enumerated in our Constitution.
Further, it is the militia of a state and of the several states that the Constitution contemplates being used in any context, during any emergency within a state, not the standing army.
The imposition of martial law by the national government over a state and its people, treating them as an occupied enemy nation, is an act of war. Such an attempted suspension of the Constitution and Bill of Rights voids the compact with the states and with the people.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union.
In response to the obscene growth of federal power and to the absurdly totalitarian claimed powers of the Executive, upwards of 20 states are considering, have considered, or have passed courageous resolutions affirming states rights and sovereignty.
Those resolutions follow in the honored and revered footsteps of Jefferson and Madison in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, and likewise seek to enforce the Constitution by affirming the very same principles of our Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights that we Oath Keepers recognize and affirm.
Chief among those principles is that ours is a dual sovereignty system, with the people of each state retaining all powers not granted to the national government they created, and thus the people of each state reserved to themselves the right to judge when the national government they created has voided the compact between the states by asserting powers never granted.
Upon the declaration by a state that such a breach has occurred, we will not obey orders to force that state to submit to the national government.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the blockade of Boston, and the occupying of that city by the British military, under martial law. Once hostilities began, the people of Boston were tricked into turning in their arms in exchange for safe passage, but were then forbidden to leave. That confinement of the residents of an entire city was an act of war.
Such tactics were repeated by the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto, and by the Imperial Japanese in Nanking, turning entire cities into death camps. Any such order to disarm and confine the people of an American city will be an act of war and thus an act of treason.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
Mass, forced internment into concentration camps was a hallmark of every fascist and communist dictatorship in the 20th Century. Such internment was unfortunately even used against American citizens of Japanese descent during World War II. Whenever a government interns its own people, it treats them like an occupied enemy population. Oppressive governments often use the internment of women and children to break the will of the men fighting for their liberty – as was done to the Boers, to the Jewish resisters in the Warsaw Ghetto, and to the Chechens, for example.
Such a vile order to forcibly intern Americans without charges or trial would be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason, regardless of the pretext used. We will not commit treason, nor will we facilitate or support it.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war.
During the American Revolution, the British government enlisted the aid of Hessian mercenaries in an attempt to subjugate the rebellious American people. Throughout history, repressive regimes have enlisted the aid of foreign troops and mercenaries who have no bonds with the people.
Accordingly, as the militia of the several states are the only military force contemplated by the Constitution, in Article I, Section 8, for domestic keeping of the peace, and as the use of even our own standing army for such purposes is without such constitutional support, the use of foreign troops and mercenaries against the people is wildly unconstitutional, egregious, and an act of war.
We will oppose such troops as enemies of the people and we will treat all who request, invite, and aid those foreign troops as the traitors they are.
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the seizure and forfeiture of American ships, goods, and supplies, along with the seizure of American timber for the Royal Navy, all in violation of the people’s natural right to their property and to the fruits of their labor. The final spark of the Revolution was the attempt by the government to seize powder and cannon stores at Concord.
Deprivation of food has long been a weapon of war and oppression, with millions intentionally starved to death by fascist and communist governments in the 20th Century alone.
Accordingly, we will not obey or facilitate orders to confiscate food and other essential supplies from the people, and we will consider all those who issue or carry out such orders to be the enemies of the people.
10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
There would have been no American Revolution without fiery speakers and writers such as James Otis, Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Sam Adams “setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
Patrick Henry: "Give me Liberty, or Give me DEATH!"
Tyrants know that the pen of a man such as Thomas Paine can cause them more damage than entire armies, and thus they always seek to suppress the natural rights of speech, association, and assembly. Without freedom of speech, the people will have no recourse but to arms. Without freedom of speech and conscience, there is no freedom.
Therefore, we will not obey or support any orders to suppress or violate the right of the people to speak, associate, worship, assemble, communicate, or petition government for the redress of grievances.
— And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually affirm our oath and pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. Oath Keepers
The above list is not exhaustive but we do consider them to be clear tripwires – they form our “line in the sand,” and if we receive such orders, we will not obey them. Further, we will know that the time for another American Revolution is nigh. If such a revolution comes, at that time, not only will we NOT fire upon our fellow Americans who righteously resist such egregious violations of their God given rights, we will join them in fighting against those who dare attempt to enslave them.
To the LMPD officers out there, that took the same oath these men and women took, but feel as though you are alone in your patriotism with all the unconstitutional acts being done to American citizens, I say take a look at this website and know their are others out there that feel the same as you. Your not alone.
God Bless
5/26/2009
With such illustrations as the other day when a video was shown on the news of 5 police officers beating an unarmed, unconsence man with billybats and fist, which ultimately lead to all 5 cops being fired, does not define the majority of men and women serving in all services including the police.
90% of police that take the oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic truly mean it, unlike the ones that beat the man in Alabama. Matter of fact there is a non-partisan association called Oath Keepers, currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, peace officers, and veterans that has a website telling exactly what orders they will not obey because they are unconstitutional and therefore unlawful.
Here are the orders these freedom loving Military and police will not obey with their reasoning.
1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people.
The attempt to disarm the people on April 19, 1775 was the spark of open conflict in the American Revolution. That vile attempt was an act of war, and the American people fought back in justified, righteous self-defense of their natural rights. Any such order today would also be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason. We will not make war on our own people, and we will not commit treason by obeying any such treasonous order.
Nor will we assist, or support any such attempt to disarm the people by other government entities, either state or federal.
In addition, we affirm that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military power of the people so that they will, in the last resort, have effective final recourse to arms and to the God of Hosts in the face of tyranny. Accordingly, we oppose any and all further infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In particular we oppose a renewal of the misnamed “assault-weapons” ban or the enactment of H.R. 45 (which would register and track gun owners like convicted pedophiles).
2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects - such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the use of “writs of assistance,” which were essentially warrantless searches because there was no requirement of a showing of probable cause to a judge, and the first fiery embers of American resistance were born in opposition to those infamous writs. The Founders considered all warrantless searches to be unreasonable and egregious. It was to prevent a repeat of such violations of the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects that the Fourth Amendment was written.
We expect that sweeping warrantless searches of homes and vehicles, under some pretext, will be the means used to attempt to disarm the people.
3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the denial of the right to jury trial, the use of admiralty courts (military tribunals) instead, and the application of the laws of war to the colonists. After that experience, and being well aware of the infamous Star Chamber in English history, the Founders ensured that the international laws of war would apply only to foreign enemies, not to the American people. Thus, the Article III Treason Clause establishes the only constitutional form of trial for an American, not serving in the military, who is accused of making war on his own nation. Such a trial for treason must be before a civilian jury, not a tribunal.
The international laws of war do not trump our Bill of Rights. We reject as illegitimate any such claimed power, as did the Supreme Court in Ex Parte Milligan (1865). Any attempt to apply the laws of war to American civilians, under any pretext, such as against domestic “militia” groups the government brands “domestic terrorists,” is an act of war and an act of treason.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the attempt “to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power” by disbanding the Massachusetts legislature and appointing General Gage as “military governor.” The attempt to disarm the people of Massachusetts during that martial law sparked our Revolution. Accordingly, the power to impose martial law – the absolute rule over the people by a military officer with his will alone being law – is nowhere enumerated in our Constitution.
Further, it is the militia of a state and of the several states that the Constitution contemplates being used in any context, during any emergency within a state, not the standing army.
The imposition of martial law by the national government over a state and its people, treating them as an occupied enemy nation, is an act of war. Such an attempted suspension of the Constitution and Bill of Rights voids the compact with the states and with the people.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union.
In response to the obscene growth of federal power and to the absurdly totalitarian claimed powers of the Executive, upwards of 20 states are considering, have considered, or have passed courageous resolutions affirming states rights and sovereignty.
Those resolutions follow in the honored and revered footsteps of Jefferson and Madison in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, and likewise seek to enforce the Constitution by affirming the very same principles of our Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights that we Oath Keepers recognize and affirm.
Chief among those principles is that ours is a dual sovereignty system, with the people of each state retaining all powers not granted to the national government they created, and thus the people of each state reserved to themselves the right to judge when the national government they created has voided the compact between the states by asserting powers never granted.
Upon the declaration by a state that such a breach has occurred, we will not obey orders to force that state to submit to the national government.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the blockade of Boston, and the occupying of that city by the British military, under martial law. Once hostilities began, the people of Boston were tricked into turning in their arms in exchange for safe passage, but were then forbidden to leave. That confinement of the residents of an entire city was an act of war.
Such tactics were repeated by the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto, and by the Imperial Japanese in Nanking, turning entire cities into death camps. Any such order to disarm and confine the people of an American city will be an act of war and thus an act of treason.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
Mass, forced internment into concentration camps was a hallmark of every fascist and communist dictatorship in the 20th Century. Such internment was unfortunately even used against American citizens of Japanese descent during World War II. Whenever a government interns its own people, it treats them like an occupied enemy population. Oppressive governments often use the internment of women and children to break the will of the men fighting for their liberty – as was done to the Boers, to the Jewish resisters in the Warsaw Ghetto, and to the Chechens, for example.
Such a vile order to forcibly intern Americans without charges or trial would be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason, regardless of the pretext used. We will not commit treason, nor will we facilitate or support it.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war.
During the American Revolution, the British government enlisted the aid of Hessian mercenaries in an attempt to subjugate the rebellious American people. Throughout history, repressive regimes have enlisted the aid of foreign troops and mercenaries who have no bonds with the people.
Accordingly, as the militia of the several states are the only military force contemplated by the Constitution, in Article I, Section 8, for domestic keeping of the peace, and as the use of even our own standing army for such purposes is without such constitutional support, the use of foreign troops and mercenaries against the people is wildly unconstitutional, egregious, and an act of war.
We will oppose such troops as enemies of the people and we will treat all who request, invite, and aid those foreign troops as the traitors they are.
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever.
One of the causes of the American Revolution was the seizure and forfeiture of American ships, goods, and supplies, along with the seizure of American timber for the Royal Navy, all in violation of the people’s natural right to their property and to the fruits of their labor. The final spark of the Revolution was the attempt by the government to seize powder and cannon stores at Concord.
Deprivation of food has long been a weapon of war and oppression, with millions intentionally starved to death by fascist and communist governments in the 20th Century alone.
Accordingly, we will not obey or facilitate orders to confiscate food and other essential supplies from the people, and we will consider all those who issue or carry out such orders to be the enemies of the people.
10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
There would have been no American Revolution without fiery speakers and writers such as James Otis, Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Sam Adams “setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
Patrick Henry: "Give me Liberty, or Give me DEATH!"
Tyrants know that the pen of a man such as Thomas Paine can cause them more damage than entire armies, and thus they always seek to suppress the natural rights of speech, association, and assembly. Without freedom of speech, the people will have no recourse but to arms. Without freedom of speech and conscience, there is no freedom.
Therefore, we will not obey or support any orders to suppress or violate the right of the people to speak, associate, worship, assemble, communicate, or petition government for the redress of grievances.
— And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually affirm our oath and pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. Oath Keepers
The above list is not exhaustive but we do consider them to be clear tripwires – they form our “line in the sand,” and if we receive such orders, we will not obey them. Further, we will know that the time for another American Revolution is nigh. If such a revolution comes, at that time, not only will we NOT fire upon our fellow Americans who righteously resist such egregious violations of their God given rights, we will join them in fighting against those who dare attempt to enslave them.
To the LMPD officers out there, that took the same oath these men and women took, but feel as though you are alone in your patriotism with all the unconstitutional acts being done to American citizens, I say take a look at this website and know their are others out there that feel the same as you. Your not alone.
God Bless
Friday, May 22, 2009
What Doesn't Fit? Crack Head, Purse Snatcher, Schizophrenic, Surface-To-Air Missile
Fighting For Freedom
5/22/09
Does any one remember the game called "what does not fit?" That's the game that came to mind while reading the New York Times article entitled "In Bronx Bomb Case, Steps and Missteps, on Tape," about the men arrested for plotting to shoot down a military plane and blow up a mosque.
While reading the article I kept saying to myself that these guys are lucky to tie their shoes, much less plan such a skilled plot that the FBI is accusing these guys of planning. These men, one being a crack head and another being a purse snatcher while the other being on medication for "schizophrenia or a bi-polar disorder," just doesn't yell out terrorist; or does it?
With the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) over the past couple of years doing everything in their power to sell the dumbed down public the need for their police state tactics in America, accusing basically every American of being a terrorist or extremist if they engage in "blogging, are pro-1st amendment, pro-second amendment, enjoy hunting, are anti-abortion, pro- abortion, anti-death penalty, animal rights activist or if you have a Ron Paul bumper sticker on the bumper of your car," this "terror plot" comes at a great time doesn't it?
With these men being recruited and radicalized by the FBI's confidential informant and who gave the fake weapons to these men, was also convicted on federal identity theft charges in 02' from which he began working for the FBI as a confidential informant and who began showing up at a mosque in Newburgh around 2007, speaking of violence and jehad, offering a "substantial amount of money" to some of the congregation to join his "team," screams of a government provocateured set up.
This "terror-plot" should however be very useful PR for the DHS to continue their assault on American freedoms from which New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a statement, “This latest attempt to attack our freedoms shows that the homeland security threats against New York City are sadly all too real and underscores why we must remain vigilant in our efforts to prevent terrorism,” along with Rep. Peter King, of New York saying," “This was a long, well-planned investigation, and it shows how real the threat is from homegrown terrorists.”
Officials are already seizing upon these men arrests, with DHS right behind them, as a means to further their agenda of "domestic terrorist" being a real threat thus we Americans should gladly and willfuly hand over our freedoms so the Government can protect us, when in reality I have never came across a "domestic terrorist" that didn't have the Fed in the back ground pulling the strings.
5/22/09
Does any one remember the game called "what does not fit?" That's the game that came to mind while reading the New York Times article entitled "In Bronx Bomb Case, Steps and Missteps, on Tape," about the men arrested for plotting to shoot down a military plane and blow up a mosque.
While reading the article I kept saying to myself that these guys are lucky to tie their shoes, much less plan such a skilled plot that the FBI is accusing these guys of planning. These men, one being a crack head and another being a purse snatcher while the other being on medication for "schizophrenia or a bi-polar disorder," just doesn't yell out terrorist; or does it?
With the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) over the past couple of years doing everything in their power to sell the dumbed down public the need for their police state tactics in America, accusing basically every American of being a terrorist or extremist if they engage in "blogging, are pro-1st amendment, pro-second amendment, enjoy hunting, are anti-abortion, pro- abortion, anti-death penalty, animal rights activist or if you have a Ron Paul bumper sticker on the bumper of your car," this "terror plot" comes at a great time doesn't it?
With these men being recruited and radicalized by the FBI's confidential informant and who gave the fake weapons to these men, was also convicted on federal identity theft charges in 02' from which he began working for the FBI as a confidential informant and who began showing up at a mosque in Newburgh around 2007, speaking of violence and jehad, offering a "substantial amount of money" to some of the congregation to join his "team," screams of a government provocateured set up.
This "terror-plot" should however be very useful PR for the DHS to continue their assault on American freedoms from which New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a statement, “This latest attempt to attack our freedoms shows that the homeland security threats against New York City are sadly all too real and underscores why we must remain vigilant in our efforts to prevent terrorism,” along with Rep. Peter King, of New York saying," “This was a long, well-planned investigation, and it shows how real the threat is from homegrown terrorists.”
Officials are already seizing upon these men arrests, with DHS right behind them, as a means to further their agenda of "domestic terrorist" being a real threat thus we Americans should gladly and willfuly hand over our freedoms so the Government can protect us, when in reality I have never came across a "domestic terrorist" that didn't have the Fed in the back ground pulling the strings.
Friday, May 15, 2009
Boy Scouts Now Training To Fight Terrorist
Fighting for Freedom
5/15/2009
Yesterday, the New york Times did an article entitled "Scouts Train to Fight Terrorists, and More" in how the Border Patrol, which is a part of the DHS (Department of Homeland Security,) are now training teenagers in whats called The Explorer program, a coeducational affiliate of the Boy Scouts of America that began 60 years ago, to fight such things as as a "disgruntled Iraq war veteran," who in the fake scenario had "already taken out two people," with one covered in blood on the floor.
I don't know about you, but when I was in the Boy Scouts in the late 70's, I remember such things as cutting from a block of wood, a race car, from which we would race. However, now we have the Government teaching kids skills "used to confront terrorism, illegal immigration and escalating border violence," with Border agents telling these kids how to quite a unruly lookout saying, "Put him on his face and put a knee in his back, I guarantee that he’ll shut up.”
A few weeks ago the DHS had a intelligence report called "Right wing extremism" leaked to the public that was to only be for law enforcement and subject to no FOIA, which as the scenario above pointed out, called returning men and women from Iraq as "potential terrorist" among others like pro-1st amendment, pro-second amendment, anti-abortionist and any one who had a Ron Paul bumper sticker on their car and a firm grip on the Constitution as also being a possible Timothy McVeigh.
Before that DHS report was leaked, another report called the MIAC report was uncovered, from which it equates also anyone who is “anti-government,” “anti-abortion,” or who enjoy rifle shooting practice and hunting as being potential terrorist.
If my memory serves me correctly, the DHS primary responsibilities is protecting the territory of the U.S. from terrorist attacks and responding to natural disasters. However, for a while now the DHS has put its efforts in not finding AlQuada terrorist, but, in fact turning their efforts and focus on the American people with such things as last year for instance with DHS giving the Shively Police Department a $39,000 grant to buy a scanner that scans 1,500 license plates a min. I don't know about you, but I don't believe that AlQuada will be driving around Shively in a car that has expired tags or for that matter, has a outstanding warrant.
We have the DHS calling and going to a toy store in St.Helen's Ore. and confronting the owner Stephanie Cox over a toy called the Magic Cube, which he (one of the agents) said was an illegal copy of the Rubik's Cube, one of the most popular toys of all time from which to remove the toy from the shelves (to keep America safe from terrorist of course). This was reported by the AP in 2004.
We also have the DHS spying on American activist from which 53 men and women including 2 Catholic nuns a Democratic candidate for Congress, a man who campaigns against military recruiting at high schools and one person who has never set foot in the state were wrongly classified as terrorist by the Maryland State Police and their names and information were put into a state and Federal database that tracks terrorism suspects.
If you noticed, I'm speaking of the DHS in both the Bush Adm. and the Obama Adm., so this is not a political assault of a certain party but an observation that the left-right paradigm is alive and well and you, the American citizen, are in the cross hairs as far as DHS is concerned, no matter what Party, Democrat or Republican, is in office.
5/15/2009
Yesterday, the New york Times did an article entitled "Scouts Train to Fight Terrorists, and More" in how the Border Patrol, which is a part of the DHS (Department of Homeland Security,) are now training teenagers in whats called The Explorer program, a coeducational affiliate of the Boy Scouts of America that began 60 years ago, to fight such things as as a "disgruntled Iraq war veteran," who in the fake scenario had "already taken out two people," with one covered in blood on the floor.
I don't know about you, but when I was in the Boy Scouts in the late 70's, I remember such things as cutting from a block of wood, a race car, from which we would race. However, now we have the Government teaching kids skills "used to confront terrorism, illegal immigration and escalating border violence," with Border agents telling these kids how to quite a unruly lookout saying, "Put him on his face and put a knee in his back, I guarantee that he’ll shut up.”
A few weeks ago the DHS had a intelligence report called "Right wing extremism" leaked to the public that was to only be for law enforcement and subject to no FOIA, which as the scenario above pointed out, called returning men and women from Iraq as "potential terrorist" among others like pro-1st amendment, pro-second amendment, anti-abortionist and any one who had a Ron Paul bumper sticker on their car and a firm grip on the Constitution as also being a possible Timothy McVeigh.
Before that DHS report was leaked, another report called the MIAC report was uncovered, from which it equates also anyone who is “anti-government,” “anti-abortion,” or who enjoy rifle shooting practice and hunting as being potential terrorist.
If my memory serves me correctly, the DHS primary responsibilities is protecting the territory of the U.S. from terrorist attacks and responding to natural disasters. However, for a while now the DHS has put its efforts in not finding AlQuada terrorist, but, in fact turning their efforts and focus on the American people with such things as last year for instance with DHS giving the Shively Police Department a $39,000 grant to buy a scanner that scans 1,500 license plates a min. I don't know about you, but I don't believe that AlQuada will be driving around Shively in a car that has expired tags or for that matter, has a outstanding warrant.
We have the DHS calling and going to a toy store in St.Helen's Ore. and confronting the owner Stephanie Cox over a toy called the Magic Cube, which he (one of the agents) said was an illegal copy of the Rubik's Cube, one of the most popular toys of all time from which to remove the toy from the shelves (to keep America safe from terrorist of course). This was reported by the AP in 2004.
We also have the DHS spying on American activist from which 53 men and women including 2 Catholic nuns a Democratic candidate for Congress, a man who campaigns against military recruiting at high schools and one person who has never set foot in the state were wrongly classified as terrorist by the Maryland State Police and their names and information were put into a state and Federal database that tracks terrorism suspects.
If you noticed, I'm speaking of the DHS in both the Bush Adm. and the Obama Adm., so this is not a political assault of a certain party but an observation that the left-right paradigm is alive and well and you, the American citizen, are in the cross hairs as far as DHS is concerned, no matter what Party, Democrat or Republican, is in office.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Government Now Taking Citizens Homes Even When Fully Paid For
Fighting for Freedom
5/13/2009
With this tyrannical Government getting more and more out of control with such things as the Courier reported on the other day with how Ky. is going to begin their yearly "seat belt" checkpoints over the summer, which has been ruled in 2000 by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional in a 6-3 ruling from which O'Conner said explicitly that DUI and border check points were the only check points considered Constitutional. However, its apparent the Government believes it is above the law because it continues to put these unconstitutional check points in place.
We now have the tyrannical Government kicking in peoples doors and arresting American citizens saying they are trespassing on the peoples personal properties even though these people own, out right, the property. Yes the house was paid for in full. Here is the audio of this 54 year old woman speaking to a news agency on her phone, while the Government is kicking in her door and arresting her and her daughter while her grandchildren watch in horror across the street.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nLsaXc8Kno
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ltp4tL_YMHo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuXflaJMtmU
5/13/2009
With this tyrannical Government getting more and more out of control with such things as the Courier reported on the other day with how Ky. is going to begin their yearly "seat belt" checkpoints over the summer, which has been ruled in 2000 by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional in a 6-3 ruling from which O'Conner said explicitly that DUI and border check points were the only check points considered Constitutional. However, its apparent the Government believes it is above the law because it continues to put these unconstitutional check points in place.
We now have the tyrannical Government kicking in peoples doors and arresting American citizens saying they are trespassing on the peoples personal properties even though these people own, out right, the property. Yes the house was paid for in full. Here is the audio of this 54 year old woman speaking to a news agency on her phone, while the Government is kicking in her door and arresting her and her daughter while her grandchildren watch in horror across the street.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nLsaXc8Kno
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ltp4tL_YMHo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuXflaJMtmU
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Senator Cardin Wants Newspapers To Become Tax Exempt
Fighting for Freedom
5/10/2009
If you can not trust the main stream media now to report the news, accurately; how much do you think you would be able to trust the MSM if they went tax exempt as a result of being bailed out by the Government? Well believe it or not this could be on its way to becoming a reality, and a scary reality at that.
Late March this scenario took a very real turn towards the main stream media getting in bed with the Government when the Maryland Democrat Benjamin Cardin, proposed legislation to the House for newspapers to be allowed to be a tax exempt, non-profit organization.
With times being extremely hard for people or organizations today that have thrived in the past with little to none financial problems makes for a scary situation from which people or organizations can react with out stopping and thinking of the consequences of their actions. That sounds a whole lot like Sen. Cardin reaction to the failing newspaper organization by saying "We are losing our newspaper industry."
I myself believe this would be the greatest blunder in America history. The media is the back bone to a true democracy from which without the media, our democracy would fail undoubtedly. As anyone knows, if a organization files 501(c)(3), then that very organization can not "publicly" have a political opinion or speak out against the Government in any way. "
The IRS prohibits nonprofits from any bias that would "favor one candidate over another ... oppose a candidate in some manner; or ... have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates." As you can see, this is a very serious situation.
Here is the Bill that Sen. Cardin introduced.
5/10/2009
If you can not trust the main stream media now to report the news, accurately; how much do you think you would be able to trust the MSM if they went tax exempt as a result of being bailed out by the Government? Well believe it or not this could be on its way to becoming a reality, and a scary reality at that.
Late March this scenario took a very real turn towards the main stream media getting in bed with the Government when the Maryland Democrat Benjamin Cardin, proposed legislation to the House for newspapers to be allowed to be a tax exempt, non-profit organization.
With times being extremely hard for people or organizations today that have thrived in the past with little to none financial problems makes for a scary situation from which people or organizations can react with out stopping and thinking of the consequences of their actions. That sounds a whole lot like Sen. Cardin reaction to the failing newspaper organization by saying "We are losing our newspaper industry."
I myself believe this would be the greatest blunder in America history. The media is the back bone to a true democracy from which without the media, our democracy would fail undoubtedly. As anyone knows, if a organization files 501(c)(3), then that very organization can not "publicly" have a political opinion or speak out against the Government in any way. "
The IRS prohibits nonprofits from any bias that would "favor one candidate over another ... oppose a candidate in some manner; or ... have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates." As you can see, this is a very serious situation.
Here is the Bill that Sen. Cardin introduced.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Have A Patriotic Bumpersticker, Maybe Your A Extremist/ Terrorist
Fighting for Freedom
5/8/2009
I'm absolutely amazed at the America I live in today, in that a person can be held for half hour by the police, for possibly being an "extremist" because of a bumper sticker this person displayed on the bumper of his car. The persons identity is being with held for privacy reasons but was reported by the mans sister-in-law Rosemarie, a resident of Ball, Louisiana to Conservative website americanvision.org.
This is not the same America I grew up being taught about in school. In fact America is looking more like China or Russia with these kinds of anti-1st Amendment, tyrannical measures being used against law abiding, Patriotic, American citizens.
It seems that the Louisiana Police are in fact acting on the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) report entitled "Right Wing Extremist" that was leaked last month from which calls American citizens that are pro-1st Amendment and pro-2nd Amendment, or goes against the main stream media, along with returning military men and women as potential Timothy McVeighs, and being potential domestic terrorist.
So what is this God awful bumper sticker that caused this person to be held by the Louisiana police for half an hour and thought to be a "extremist?"
Its called Gadsden flag. It was named after General and statesman Christopher Gadsden and dated back to 1775, while also used by the Marine Corp. as their early motto "Don't tread on Me".
However the Louisiana Police department does not care about a Patriotic American displaying a patriotic flag, since they have been trained into believing any American that shows his Love for the Constitution as being possible terrorist.
5/8/2009
I'm absolutely amazed at the America I live in today, in that a person can be held for half hour by the police, for possibly being an "extremist" because of a bumper sticker this person displayed on the bumper of his car. The persons identity is being with held for privacy reasons but was reported by the mans sister-in-law Rosemarie, a resident of Ball, Louisiana to Conservative website americanvision.org.
This is not the same America I grew up being taught about in school. In fact America is looking more like China or Russia with these kinds of anti-1st Amendment, tyrannical measures being used against law abiding, Patriotic, American citizens.
It seems that the Louisiana Police are in fact acting on the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) report entitled "Right Wing Extremist" that was leaked last month from which calls American citizens that are pro-1st Amendment and pro-2nd Amendment, or goes against the main stream media, along with returning military men and women as potential Timothy McVeighs, and being potential domestic terrorist.
So what is this God awful bumper sticker that caused this person to be held by the Louisiana police for half an hour and thought to be a "extremist?"
Its called Gadsden flag. It was named after General and statesman Christopher Gadsden and dated back to 1775, while also used by the Marine Corp. as their early motto "Don't tread on Me".
However the Louisiana Police department does not care about a Patriotic American displaying a patriotic flag, since they have been trained into believing any American that shows his Love for the Constitution as being possible terrorist.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
HR 1966: Anti-1st Amendment Legislation, Hurt Someones Feelings, Then Go To Prison
Fighting For Freedom
5/6/2009
Well people, here we are once again with our 1st Amendment right being attacked. The Courier did a article the other day on the KKK and how the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) filed suit in civil court, because a court of law would not touch the kangaroo charges, which ultimately violated a persons civil rights and Constitutional rights, for simply speaking his mind. However this is but the tip of the iceburg with regards to speaking our minds and being swifted off to prison if the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act HR 1966 passes the Senate and becomes law. What HR 1966 basically says that if you hurt someone's feeling, by asserting your 1st Amendment right, then you can be charged with a felony and fined along with being sent to prison for 2 years.
Here is the Bill in its entirety
Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act (Introduced in House)
HR 1966 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1966
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 2, 2009
Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COURTNEY, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Four out of five of United States children aged 2 to 17 live in a home where either they or their parents access the Internet.
(2) Youth who create Internet content and use social networking sites are more likely to be targets of cyberbullying.
(3) Electronic communications provide anonymity to the perpetrator and the potential for widespread public distribution, potentially making them severely dangerous and cruel to youth.
(4) Online victimizations are associated with emotional distress and other psychological problems, including depression.
(5) Cyberbullying can cause psychological harm, including depression; negatively impact academic performance, safety, and the well-being of children in school; force children to change schools; and in some cases lead to extreme violent behavior, including murder and suicide.
(6) Sixty percent of mental health professionals who responded to the Survey of Internet Mental Health Issues report having treated at least one patient with a problematic Internet experience in the previous five years; 54 percent of these clients were 18 years of age or younger.
SEC. 3. CYBERBULLYING.
(a) In General- Chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Sec. 881. Cyberbullying
(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(b) As used in this section–
(1) the term ‘communication’ means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; and
(2) the term `electronic means’ means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.’.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
881. Cyberbullying.’.
This bill does not support American values and is certainly not what our founding fathers would have ever allowed and would have been considered high treason only a few years ago. This bill goes against every principle America was built on and if passed will ultimately kill this country from which thousands upon thousands of men and women have bravely fought and died to keep from happening. This bill is the poster child of a tyrant Government gone wild.
5/6/2009
Well people, here we are once again with our 1st Amendment right being attacked. The Courier did a article the other day on the KKK and how the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) filed suit in civil court, because a court of law would not touch the kangaroo charges, which ultimately violated a persons civil rights and Constitutional rights, for simply speaking his mind. However this is but the tip of the iceburg with regards to speaking our minds and being swifted off to prison if the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act HR 1966 passes the Senate and becomes law. What HR 1966 basically says that if you hurt someone's feeling, by asserting your 1st Amendment right, then you can be charged with a felony and fined along with being sent to prison for 2 years.
Here is the Bill in its entirety
Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act (Introduced in House)
HR 1966 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1966
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 2, 2009
Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COURTNEY, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Four out of five of United States children aged 2 to 17 live in a home where either they or their parents access the Internet.
(2) Youth who create Internet content and use social networking sites are more likely to be targets of cyberbullying.
(3) Electronic communications provide anonymity to the perpetrator and the potential for widespread public distribution, potentially making them severely dangerous and cruel to youth.
(4) Online victimizations are associated with emotional distress and other psychological problems, including depression.
(5) Cyberbullying can cause psychological harm, including depression; negatively impact academic performance, safety, and the well-being of children in school; force children to change schools; and in some cases lead to extreme violent behavior, including murder and suicide.
(6) Sixty percent of mental health professionals who responded to the Survey of Internet Mental Health Issues report having treated at least one patient with a problematic Internet experience in the previous five years; 54 percent of these clients were 18 years of age or younger.
SEC. 3. CYBERBULLYING.
(a) In General- Chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Sec. 881. Cyberbullying
(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(b) As used in this section–
(1) the term ‘communication’ means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; and
(2) the term `electronic means’ means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.’.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
881. Cyberbullying.’.
This bill does not support American values and is certainly not what our founding fathers would have ever allowed and would have been considered high treason only a few years ago. This bill goes against every principle America was built on and if passed will ultimately kill this country from which thousands upon thousands of men and women have bravely fought and died to keep from happening. This bill is the poster child of a tyrant Government gone wild.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
